SEUSITES

In this video I compare and show what SC2 looks like in four different computers systems. first: A fast quad core computer with an ATI 5770 – the game ran great on ultra high graphics. second: The same quad core computer, but with a slower Nvidia 8600GT video card this time – the game ran great, but only on medium graphics. third: A single core system running at 2.1 GHz and a Nvidia 8600GT – the game had some hiccups, but it was at least barely playable at medium graphic settings. fourth: The same single core system, but using the integrated Geforce 6100 graphics solution — the game was not really playable, even on low graphics settings. ————————— Conclusion: Slow computers using a slow integrated graphics solution will not be able to play SC2 at all. This includes many older laptops and many newer netbooks. As for most modern computers with dual-core processors and a modern on-board video solutions, it should just barely be able to play SC2 on low graphic setting – this includes on-board graphic solutions such as Intel’s 4500HD or GMA HD onboard graphics chip, or the Nvidia ION graphics chip — but a fast processor will also be required. Such a system is not recommended though. Lastly, to play SC2 with anything higher than Medium graphics will require a decent processor and a relatively high end graphics card – probably one that costs $100 or more. ..btw, I beat the SC2 single player in 12 hours – the game was fun, although it was not without some …